| The Scottish system of land ownership has
been based on the feudal system since the Middle Ages, the feudal
theory being that all land belongs to the Crown who would originally
grant feu charters to noblemen in exchange for promises of military
service etc. These nobles in turn would grant feu charters of areas
of land to vassals in exchange for services or payment of feuduty.
Legislation to abolish feuduty was passed in 1974 but the feudal theory
has until now remained the basis of land ownership in Scotland, with
most land and buildings being subject to title conditions enforceable
by a feudal superior.
Some explanation of the legal terms may be helpful:-
- the feuar or vassal is the owner of the land held
on a feudal title. The feuar's interest is known as the dominium
utile;
- the feudal superior has certain rights in the same land.
His interest is known as the superiority or dominium
directum and includes a right to enforce the title conditions;
- feuduty is an annual cash payment by the feuar to the
superior. Most feuduties have now been redeemed;
- a feudal grant of title such as a Feu Charter
or a Feu Disposition is a conveyance of land whereby the
granter of the deed becomes the feudal superior of what is conveyed
and the grantee becomes the feuar;
- a Disposition is a conveyance of land which does not
create the relationship of superior and feuar.
Title conditions have been imposed not only by feudal grant but
also by Disposition. The Abolition of Feudal Tenure (Scotland) Act
2000 does not affect title conditions which were created otherwise
than by feudal grant. A separate J. & H. Mitchell Fact Sheet will
explain the Title Conditions (Scotland) Act 2004 which deals with
the enforceability of title conditions which either (a) have been
created by Disposition or (b) are feuing conditions which, for one
reason or another, have been preserved following the abolition of
the feudal system.
The Abolition of Feudal Tenure Etc. (Scotland) Act 2000 abolishes
all the remaining aspects of the feudal system as at 28th November
2004. On that date the feuar as owner of the dominium utile of the
feu becomes the absolute owner, equivalent to the English freehold
system. The feudal superiority and concept of feudal superior will
simply cease to exist.
The main implications are:
(a) feuduty will cease to be payable although, as mentioned below,
the former superior can require a payment from the former feuar
equivalent to the feuduty redemption payment;
(b) the former superior will no longer have a right to enforce title
conditions, but as mentioned below, can, in some circumstances,
take steps to preserve some of these conditions; and
(c) sporting rights which have been reserved in a feudal grant will
cease to be exercisable by the former superior.
Looking at these in more detail –
Feuduty
The number of remaining feuduties is relatively small. After 28th
November 2004 feuduty will cease to be payable but during the period
28th November 2004 to 28th November 2006 the former superior has
the right to serve notice on the former vassal requiring a "compensatory
payment" in respect of feuduties abolished at 28th November 2004.
The compensatory payment is calculated by reference to the price
of 2½% Consolidated Stock, i.e. the same basis on which the present
redemption of feuduty operates, which gives rise to a payment equivalent
to about twenty times the annual feuduty. The compensatory payment
will simply be a monetary debt payable by the former feuar and will
not be attached to the land in any way.
If the compensatory payment is £50 or less it must be paid within
56 days of service of the Notice. If the compensatory payment is
more than £50 the former feuar is given the opportunity to pay by
way of equal six monthly instalments as follows:-
(a) if the compensatory payment is £500 or less, by way of five
equal instalments;
(b) if it is between £500 and £1,000, by way of ten equal instalments;
(c) if it is between £1,000 and £1,500, by way of fifteen equal
instalments; and
(d) if it is more than £1,500, by way of twenty equal instalments.
The instalment dates are 28th May and 28th November in each year
following service of the Notice. Where a payment is by way of instalments
the former superior may charge an additional 10%.
There are special rules relating to cases where a feu has been
sub-divided and where the feuduty is either "allocated" or "apportioned".
This is common in the case of tenement flats.
Feuing Conditions
Feudal titles commonly include title conditions relating to (a)
reservations of minerals, (b) restrictions on use of the property
and on alterations to buildings etc. and (c) conditions relating
to maintenance of access roads, water supplies and other services
and of boundary fences etc. A reservation of minerals in a feudal
title remains valid notwithstanding the abolition of feudal tenure
but some ancillary rights connected with the minerals may be lost.
As at 28th November 2004 all burdens which were enforceable only
by the feudal superior are extinguished. Burdens in Category (c)
above will no longer be enforceable by the former superior, as superior,
but may still be enforceable by him (and possibly by others) in
their capacity as owners of other land. Feudal titles also commonly
reserve rights of access in favour of other parts of the superior's
landed estate. These are in effect servitudes and continue to be
enforceable after the abolition of feudal tenure so long as the
rights are expressed to be in favour of the relevant other land.
Preservation of Title Conditions
As mentioned earlier, the 2000 Act does not affect title conditions
established other than by feudal title. The 2000 Act provides a
mechanism for re-allotting feudal title conditions to other land
in the superior's ownership so that the present superior may have
the benefit of enforcing them in his capacity as owner of that other
land after the feudal superiority has ceased to exist. In order
to do so, the superior must register the appropriate notice in the
Land Register prior to 28th November 2004.
The circumstances in which re-allotment of burdens may be effected
are severely restricted, to the following circumstances:-
(a) The land to which the burden is re-allotted must have on it
a permanent building which is used wholly or mainly as a place of
human habitation or resort and that building must be within 100
metres of the boundary of the feu. The building must be in the superior's
ownership. A dwellinghouse, hotel, shop, workshop or office would
meet the relevant criteria but it is unlikely that agricultural
buildings are relevant.
(b) The burden comprises a right to enter, or otherwise make use
of the feu. In this case there is no requirement for the superior
to have a permanent building within 100 metres of the feu. This
category is intended to deal with reserved rights of access which
are expressed to be in favour of the superior (in his capacity as
superior) rather than reserved in favour of the owner of neighbouring
ground (who happens to be the superior). In recent titles it has
been normal for such rights to be reserved in favour of the superior
in his capacity as owner of the adjoining ground rather than in
his capacity as superior.
(c) The burden comprises a right of pre-emption or right of redemption.
In this case there is also no need for there to be a permanent building
within 100 metres of the feu.
(d) The superiority interest comprises mineral rights or salmon
fishings. Such cases are rare. The Act does not affect the ownership
of mineral rights or salmon fishings themselves.
In order to preserve and re-allot burdens in any of the foregoing
cases, the superior must register the appropriate notice in the
Land Register before 28th November 2004. Careful consideration should
be given as to whether to do so. In many cases the superior will
need to obtain updated Searches in the Register of Sasines or Land
Register to identify correctly the present owners of the feus. The
notice to be registered must clearly identify both the feu and the
superior's property to which the burden is to be re-allotted so
that these can be identified on the Ordnance Survey map, and accordingly
new plans will be required in many cases. In cases where superiors
are interested in preserving and re-allotting feuing conditions
the estate titles will need to be searched to identify precisely
the cases where re-allotment of burdens may be appropriate and may
be worth implementing. This can be time consuming and costly.
Before registering the notice, the superior must execute an Affidavit
in the presence of a Notary Public certifying that the information
contained in the notice is true. A copy of the notice must be served
on the feuar.
Registers of Scotland charge £25 for registering the notice, or
£50 if it requires to be registered both in the Register of Sasines
and Land Register.
In cases where the burdens are re-allotted, it should not be assumed
that the title conditions will necessarily continue to be enforceable
as the former superior will still need to demonstrate an interest
to enforce should he wish to do so. However, as the circumstances
in which re-allotment of burdens is possible are so restricted,
the former superior will probably be able to demonstrate an interest
to enforce in almost all such cases. The attitude of the Courts
to this matter remains to be seen.
Re-allotment of Burdens by agreement or by Order of the Lands
Tribunal for Scotland
If none of the circumstances mentioned above for the re-allotment
of burdens apply, the burden may still be re-allotted by agreement
of the parties so long as the Agreement is registered before 28th
November 2004. It is hard to envisage feuars being willing to enter
into such Agreements with their superiors and if the burden does
not meet one of the categories mentioned earlier it may be unlikely
that the burden would be of sufficient benefit to the superior's
property as to remain enforceable.
If the superior has tried unsuccessfully to re-allot a burden
by agreement he may apply to the Lands Tribunal for Scotland for
an order re-allotting the burden to a particular property in the
superior's ownership. It is thought unlikely that the Lands Tribunal
will be willing in many cases to grant such applications.
Rights of Pre-emption and Rights of Redemption
As mentioned earlier, a right of pre-emption may be re-allotted
to a particular property in the superior's ownership. The 100 metre
rule does not apply. The superior should choose the property in
his ownership which is to have the benefit of the right and must
register the appropriate Notice at the Land Register before 28th
November 2004. If the superior no longer owns property in the area
he may convert the right of pre-emption or redemption to a new personal
right by registering the appropriate Notice in the Land Register
before 28th November 2004. Thereafter the former superior may assign
(or even sell) the right should he wish to do so.
Development Value Burdens
In cases where land has been conveyed by feudal grant at a price
lower than the full market value because of some restriction on
development imposed by the superior in the title, the superior may
register a Notice in the Land Register prior to 28th November 2004
to register an interest in a claim for compensation in the event
of the development which is at present prohibited taking place in
the future. The claim to compensation is, however, restricted as
follows:-
(i) it applies only if the development occurs in the period 1999
to 2024; and
(ii) the amount of compensation payable relates to the reduction
in price which the development value burden would have produced
at the time the feu was granted, with no adjustment to take account
of the subsequent rise in property values or any other factors.
Conservation Burdens
Certain specified bodies will have the right to continue to enforce
"conservation burdens" which are considered to be for the benefit
of the public. A typical case would be burdens imposed by Deed of
Conditions by the National Trust for Scotland where a number of
houses have been restored. Such burdens will remain enforceable
if the relevant conservation body registers the appropriate notice
prior to 28th November 2004.
|